More from the Death Eaters

It's like the evil characters in Harry Potter that work for Valdomort: they cheer death:

This was the CNN/Tea Party Debate. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that the teabaggers are the most bloodthirsty Republicans of all (is that possible?) but they do worship their own self-righteous anger.

A vote for a Republican is a vote to dismantle the Federal government's ability to help we the people. The only winners will be the mega corps, the mega churches and mega defense. It's a vote for more and earlier death for our aged and infirm, our sickened no matter how suddenly, our children through the environment and educational neglect.

And CNN decides to partner up with this staunch political group. The John Birch Society, mainstreamed by our media.

Potter

For the first time I've actually gone to see a Harry Potter movie in the theater and, thankfully, had a great time. I've been reading the books to my eldest son for, say, a million years, very close to finishing the final one, and the current film, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, adapts the penultimate volume, #6. However, there will be two more movies from the final book since it's huge, and even this one is getting reamed by some of the hardcore book fans who are as upset about the missing plotlines and characters necessary to fit into even the 153 minute running time as the hardcore Lord of the Rings book fans were about the absence for Tom Bombadil. And how much did the regular moviegoer miss old Tom? That is to say, not at all.

I know that some of my readers are non-fans and perhaps take a haughty view of the entire series by J.K. Rowlings and filmmaking collaborators. Too bad. The books become increasingly interesting and, yes, political, as Rowlings wrote many of them during the Bush/Blair aftermath of 9/11, with Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix feeling particularly dark, Hogwarts under a Cheney-esque repression where rights are removed one-by-one in the name of defense. As for the movies, I wasn't a huge fan of the first two Christopher Columbus-directed flicks, as his middle-of-the-road Hollywood style has always seemed as safe as it gets. However, Columbus deserves credit for establishing the look and pace of the pictures, the mix of action and character, and most of all for whatever role he had in casting the three leads.

The difference between the first film and this one, ten years later, is the difference between this:



And this:



Much of the pleasure of the latest film is watching these kids we've followed since childhood now interacting as young adults familiar both to us and to each other. This is the funniest of the films so far, with the three main cast members garnering large audience reactions with a glance or an eyebrow due to the length of the relationships. They seem like fine, unspoiled people in real life -- Daniel Radcliffe taking a risk appearing onstage in London and on Broadway naked in Equus, Emma Watson accepted at Columbia University and considering her options, and Rupert Grint seeming very regular. Grint, in particular, appears to be the most natural of the actors and, based on his quidditch playing in this picture, appears capable of maturing into an action star to match his natural comedic talents. There's plenty of great English actors providing all kinds of pleasure in supporting roles (Jim Broadbent being the new, very welcome edition), but it's the kids who are most alright, and the focus of attention.

While I'll forever hold a special place in my cinematic heart for the third film, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, which thanks to the direction byAlfonso Cuarón (Y tu mamá también, Children of Men) feels more like a standalone dark fantasy classic than the two Columbus predecessors, this is a terrific cinematic experience. Multiple-Potters screenwriter Steve Kloves and second-time Potter director David Yates work wonders with the unwieldy material, but the cinematographer new to the series, Bruno Delbonnel (Amelie, Across the Universe) creates strong, brilliant images. And unlike most action blockbusters these days, the shots hold long enough to satisfy, with a minimum of shaky hand-held overcompensation.

This movie is essentially setting the table for the final two-parter, ironic considering Helena Bonham Carter (the most fun she's been since Fight Club) as the evil Bellatrix Lestrange kicks every glass and table setting to shattered pieces as she strides atop on of the long dining hall tables near the end of the picture. Arch-villain Lord Voldemort doesn't even appear in his macabre adult form in anything more than a few montage frames during a special effect. But the final mission falls into place in the last scene, where our heroes realize they've never really appreciated the beauty of their boarding school's setting.

It's childhood's end, to be sure, and assuming all goes well with the final filming this movie series will do what none other ever has, not The Lord of the Rings, not James Bond. It will have matched the full length of the literary series with watching these characters age naturally from childhood to adulthood, kind of a fantasy version of Michael Apted's documentary Up Series, which has followed a number of English children from Seven Up! and every seven years hence to the upcoming 56 Up.

How fitting that both are English endeavors -- from the nation that brought us democracy and bureaucracy -- a type of cataloging in the free world, if that's not too much of a stretch.

I look forward to seeing how it all ends.

Since Dickens

When I was in high school reading Great Expectations by superstar 19th Century novelist Charles Dickens for the first or second time (9th Grade + 12th), as we got wrapped up in Pip, Estrella and Miss Havisham, I remember hearing a few times about how Dickens wrote in serialized form, and in a kind of height of the printed word distribution technology, people would read the chapters as soon as they came out.

The anticipation surrounding the final chapters of The Old Curiosity Shop, and the fate of the ill-starred girl at the center of it, was unprecedented:

In January 1841, passengers arriving in New York from Europe would be greeted by anxious people on the docks. They all had the same question: "Is Little Nell dead?" Such was the hysteria created by Charles Dickens' novel The Old Curiosity Shop.

Back then, of course, consuming media meant reading, but today that activity is for the minority of media consumers. Except for this:

Copies of the final Harry Potter book have already been shipped to customers by one U.S. online retailer, U.S. publisher Scholastic said on Wednesday, and purported copies of the novel have flooded the Internet...

...Photographs have also been posted on the Internet of what is claimed to be each page of the book, but Scholastic would not comment on whether they were real. Links to the pictures quickly flooded Web sites around the world...

...Rowling fueled speculation about the ending of the last book when she said last year that at least two characters would be killed off and a third got a reprieve.

Tight security has surrounded Rowling's eagerly awaited final novel about the teenage wizard. The first six books have sold 325 million copies worldwide.

Potter fans reacted angrily to purported Internet leaks...

So many people are so passionate about a book?

Has my whole world turned upside down?

I'm reading about literary authority Harold Bloom getting his panties in a knot because kids are reading Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows instead of The Wind in the Willows. For his information, the latter bored both my kids, no matter how much I loved it in 1964. However, I'm up to Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire with my 7-year-old, and we're having a grand time.

(Personal favorite character: Sirius Black, and not just because Gary "Sid Vicious" Oldman portrays him in the moveeeez.)

I'm sure I'll get spoiled by spoilers before my son and I work our way through the next two books and several thousand pages to even start this final volume but who cares, it's amazing that people are going so nuts for a plain ol' epic story, one told with style, intelligent character development, and imagination by a caring author.

Notoriously tough New York Times critic Michiko Kakutani summarizes this book and the series in her thoughtful review today:

The world of Harry Potter is a place where the mundane and the marvelous, the ordinary and the surreal coexist. It’s a place where cars can fly and owls can deliver the mail, a place where paintings talk and a mirror reflects people’s innermost desires. It’s also a place utterly recognizable to readers, a place where death and the catastrophes of daily life are inevitable, and people’s lives are defined by love and loss and hope — the same way they are in our own mortal world.

Congratulations, Ms. Rowling, on an epic achievement. Enjoy this time of glory and the loooong tail to follow.

But most of all, good luck and godspeed on your next creative adventure.