Showing posts with label dumb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dumb. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Stupid Person

Bye, bye, Rick:


Enjoy all the money you raised.

Oh, and Herman?


You're stupid, too.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

How Dangerous is Stupid?

Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) in their words, not mine:
“He’s like Bush only without the brains,” cracked one former Republican governor who knows Perry, repeating a joke that has made the rounds.
Interesting that the intelligence question is making the rounds, from Politico to Fox News, the latter of which is happy to leave the question open as not particularly germane to the Presidency. After all, they are dedicated to removing President Obama from office, and everyone know he's smart. Or don't they:
On his program tonight, Sean Hannity tried to turn the tables on those who would question Perry, asking his panel whether the media were missing the point that President Obama was the stupid one.
Jackboot Hannity at it again. Somebody give that fascist a uniform.

The fact is that the last time America leaned towards on quote-unquote common sense over intelligence in electing a President, the winner was George W. Bush and the loser was the United States, with ruinous tax cuts, a collapsed economy and over $1.242 trillion in war costs, let alone potentially hundreds of billions in waste and fraud.

I hate to smear the entire rightwing in this country, but as they say on Fox News when confronted with the truth, "You're confusing our viewers."

Ignorance is death.

Friday, April 16, 2010

While It Lasts

It seems clear to me that the Massachusetts Dems won't make a mistake next time with some weak-tea machine candidate without the common touch, so that means the supposed comer Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) has to be pretty damned good to keep the job.

Something tells me he'll be a one-partial-term Senator:

Asked by the Boston Globe how he'd like to see the bill improved, Brown fumbled -- appearing not even to know what it was he wanted changed in order to garner his support.

Brown left open the possibility that he could support a compromise.

"I want to see when it's going to come up, how it's going to come up,'' he said. "I'm always open to trying to work something through so it is truly bipartisan.''

Brown, whose vote could be critical as Democrats seek to find a GOP member to avoid a filibuster, assiduously avoided talking about specifics.

When asked what areas he thought should be fixed, he replied: "Well, what areas do you think should be fixed? I mean, you know, tell me. And then I'll get a team and go fix it.''

Even the Globe struggled to explain Brown's position: "He appeared to oppose the creation of a consumer protection agency within the Federal Reserve. 'It’s more government, it’s more government regulation at a time when businesses are trying just to pay their bills,' he said. 'Is that good? . . . If it’s an area we need to fix, then I’m certainly open to it. But I haven’t heard that that’s the biggest thing that’s problematic with it.'"Link

It sure won't help him -- and possibly hurt him further with the 'baggers -- if he continues to take the solid party-line position with his GOP against even debating banking reform. Especially when those banks are getting indicted.

Scott was in the right place at the right time and has obvious retail skills. He'll be out in 2012, when more Dems are swept in on the coattails of President Barack Obama, whose landslide victory could not have been predicted back in the early health care reform passage days of 2010.