Showing posts with label humanity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humanity. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2009

Battlestar

I could write about Obama on greed or Biden's new Middle Class Task Force or McCain defending Limbaugh or House Republican Leader John Boehner lying that there is $200 million for contraception in the stimulus package (it's actually a $200 million savings in the same area) or Michael Steele -- congrats to the GOP for breaking the color line in party leadership, even if it did have to be with a Republican. But all that really matters is that Battlestar Galactica ends in seven episodes, and tonight it once again proved why it is so far and away the best dramatic series currently on television.

Yes, SPOILERS.

No other American series (or one anywhere?) is dealing seriously with the ambiguities of armed insurrection by a democratic populace. I don't know another series that would even try. It seems like a feature film theme, Costa-Gavros or Winterbottom or Greengrass. Or Warren Beatty. But BSG (the acronym isn't exactly proper, but it's what's caught on) is going all the way, every single character we care about in a jackpot situation at tonight's "To Be Continued" card -- the President about to be assassinated, the Commander of Galactica and his first mate are cornered, holding off a squadron, the first cylon mother of a human-cylon hybrid is imprisoned with her child and wounded husband and threatened with rape, and the Commander's son and their best flyer, the young romantic leads, with a skeletal crew of loyalists, are the only hope for retaking the ship from the mutineer uprising.

Emotional arcs set in motion back in the first season (this is #4, or 4.5 as it seem to have broadcast) are paying off big-time, and based on the preview for next week it seems there's cashing out to be had as well. Ron Moore and David Eick, and their team of writers have been grappling with all the darkest questions that have run through the Bush years, and its fitting that the series is ending now, one wonders if it might be a note of ambiguity or a definitive verdict on the ability of humankind to both survive and evolve. Because ever since the cylon fleets destroyed all known human planetary populations, leaving us finally with @ 39,000 nomads looking for a new home, it's been a very material jackpot situation for humanity itself.

While this sci-fi series is played for real, nothing hokey, never metatextually jokey, it does have one particularly larger than life character at the center, and that's Katee Sackhoff's Starbuck. When Starbuck finally kicked into what she does best tonight, i.e. devastating righteous violence, I stood up in front of the TV and stayed there for the rest of the episode. Sackhoff is leaving it all on the floor now, ever since hollering "What am I?" over and over two episodes ago on Earth, maybe before, but she's created a new kind of female hero, the next generation past Sarah Connors of Terminator fame, the most lethal character with the strongest, simplest code. It's a more extreme form of role reversal than we've ever seen on television before, and the directness, the sudden firmness of her move to kiss Lee Adama in their strategy huddle between action sequences was her signaling her return, her leadership, her assurance.

And then there was other kiss between Commander Adama and President Roslin, the elder romantic leads and leaders of our civilization,finally revealing their love without pretense on the forgotten storage flight deck, their friends around them for the first time, an on-the-fly wedding, on the edge of their dangerous parting. Olmos, McDonnell, Sackhoff all Emmy-worthy.

They got John Dahl to direct and he did a feature-style job, particular Adama and Tigh setting up their last stand -- all Kurosawa and Peckinpah in masculinity and camera placement, especially the three shot sequence of Adama firing at the door just before the grenade is thrown in on them.

Unlike more typical series, BSG has rarely sat still, and the tension has been up and down over the past four years. But this is something bigger, and I hope it does turn out to be both surprising and satisfying in the conclusion. Where is that destination? I can't say for sure, but tonight I had an epiphany.

The ultimate arc of the series is about human evolution. There hybrid babies were all flukes, unprecidented, hence the product of either a plan we don't understand or, more likely in retrospect, natural evolution, Darwin 101. The natural mutations that occur and are needed to survive external changes in climate, food source, and interspecies threat.

So my theory is that the drama we're seeing played out is, with a step back from the intricate human stories taking us through, really about winnowing out the race to those most equipped to survive, in this case those willing to accept that the very machines we created are now independently sentient enough for us interbreed with them in order to survive as a species. Yes, we'll be different. But (and this is where the cylon search for God folds in) we'll still have a soul.

It's not dissimilar from the ultimate theme of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, where an alien race intercedes with our species every 200,000-odd years to goose our evolution. In that film a signal trace sends a crew of humanity's best and most fit -- astronauts -- to reach the signal source. However, only one representative of humanity makes it all the way, ultimately being evolved (after "death") into the Nietzchean Star-Child. Our best and our brightest, the individual apex of humanity as he has proven himself -- ironically (in light of BSG) by disabling mankind's most advanced tool, the mutinous H.A.L. supercomputer.

So while BSG doesn't have the particular formalism of Kubrick's masterwork, it is grappling with similarly monumental themes, albeit within the rubric of the best action show on television since Band of Brothers. It's obviously more character-oriented than 2001 (what isn't, the dictionary?) and warmer for that reason, but it doesn't skimp on bad news, hard choices, good guys doing questionable things like, say, America for the past eight years.

So as Bush goes out, leaving behind the stench of his doomsday, mounting in his wake (will we eventually count over 100,000 jobs lost this past week?), the question BSG asks is whether we've got what it takes to survive and prevail. It's the question we're asking ourselves as our one sliver of light has taken office. And it's going to take all of us making choices, all of us balancing our perceived needs for our selves and our families with a sense of the common good.

Will we pull together enough to survive?

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

All Too Human

Thanks to a fortuitous error in ticketing, I got to see BOTH Sean Penn's new milestone, Into the Wild, as well as the Ridley-really-means-it-this-time Final Final Director's cut of Blade Runner.

Penn's picture goes all the way out to the places where its real life protagonist trekked into certain danger, while Scott has created arguably the most enveloping vision of the future yet committed to celluloid, at the opposite end of the authentic/artificial construct spectrum from Into the Wild, but the movies have ended up complementing each other in my head, because both of them are extreme exploration of what it means to be a human being.

The human condition: both movies pose big questions about free will.

I'm going to hit some SPOILERS now, so here's your warning, with the caveat that what I'll refer to in Blade Runner has already been discussed everywhere since the first Director's cut was released, but if you haven't seen the movie you may want to skip. With Into the Wild, the ending is well known from Jon Krakauer's book among other sources, pretty much everyone I talk to knows the ending going in, but here's your SPOILERS warning as well.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
It's never really celebrated as such, but Blade Runner is the most adult -- i.e. grown-up -- movie ever made about robots. Since the replicants are so human-like, especially the three most advanced models (Roy, Rachael and, admit it, Rick Deckard), and since they die with more blood than circuitry, the audience doesn't really think of them as robots. But that's what they are, androids, a.k.a. machines.

By playing Rick's condition so subtly, the brief giveaway with the iris and the unicorn being the only solid pieces of evidence, and by directing Sean Young's Rachael to demure insolence, we end up falling for the love story, the only bolt of hope at the end. But we know that replicants all have expiration dates -- that's their defining characteristic -- we just don't know Deckard's; so it's as doomed a love affair as ever graced a noir, we're just happy for whatever few years of joy they may win.

The robots -- I mean replicants -- in Blade Runner are killers, whether commando-programmed (Roy) or pleasurebots (Pris). They think, therefore they are, as the private joke goes between those two, but they clearly are because they have killed humans, and have no conscience preventing them from doing so.

The good guys, the good bots, they have remorse. Deckard feels sick after killing Joanna Cassidy's Zhora. Watching the film a second (or third or fiftieth) time one gets the sense that he knows, at least he suspects (does he really seemed so surprised when he examines the origami unicorn?) and it makes his feel like a race traitor, with all the self-loathing that goes with it. Rachel is horrified when she guns down Leon as well.

What makes it truly complex, something you have time to feel and even dwell on thanks to the movie's dreamlike pacing, is the Brechtian element of social metaphor. If Harrison Ford is being torn apart having to retire his own kind, who are we to shoot each other, blow each other up?

We're the ones who are supposed to be human.

Having only seen one other Sean Penn-directed feature (but wishing I'd seen more) I can only say that Into the Wild is a very, very accomplished movie, relatively raw and real, an art film that could potentially cross over to the multiplex, a throwback to the early 1970's impressionistic school of Hal Ashby and Terence Malick, while being all Penn's own.

Like Blade Runner, it's an impeccable cast. Emile Hirsch courageously performs in ice cold mountain water and with a very real bear, emaciating himself over the course of the shoot, but more than that actually capturing the independent spirit of Christopher McCandless. He's one of those guys everyone knew in college, super smart but self-contained, looking forward to spending time in nature, whether in a naturalist position somewhere out in the middle of nowhere U.S.A., or maybe trekking the fiords with a hiking buddy.

The question McCandless' story asks us is how far out can one really go from society. If you cut up your credit cards, your driver's license and social security card (shades of Jack Nicholson in Antonioni's The Passenger), if you decide to go by a made-up name and sever, without warning, all contact with your family, if you go up, up to the places on the map where few or no people live, are you really finding a higher truth?

Are you now just an organism, hunting/gathering for daily survival?

Are you one with nature?

Penn ultimately reveals what I assume is a real final passage from McCandless' diary showing that he'd changed, he'd learned something about humanity that he'd taken for granted in the past. And while Penn's trustworthy technique makes a strong case in favor of his protagonist's own sincerity, the heroic side of his quest for freedom, there's also the feeling that he knows McCandless has made a bone-headed move, that's he's a young fool but a fool nonetheless, and we wonder where the line might be.

Should he we the surrogate son for the lonely octogenarian he's revived, Ron Franz (Hal Holbrook is an Oscar-worthy performance, maybe one of his last)? Should he join forces with the hippy couple (Catherine Keener and middle-aged first-timer Brian Dierker) living in Slab City in the winter and just driving their mobile home around in the other seasons, waiting patiently for the angelic and horny sixteen year-old across the way to grow legal? She he just give his trusted sister a call?

As he passes through the lives of lonely people, sprinkling them with his presence which seems to heal rends and right boats, the sense you get is of a world of loneliness, one he accepts and embraces, one that comes as a shock to his heartbroken parents, one that speaks endlessly about the human condition.

Here's a guy who chose to be lonely. And however much we might admire or love him, he couldn't go the distance in the end. Because it's only an ideal; an impossible place to go.

McCandless builds his own trap but it's bourne of the ultimate truth that we all die alone, wondering how what we did before leads to where we end up. Deckard and his most sentient fellow replicants know that their past is a plant, that the memories are just design values, that they have a time to end just like us, albeit one more ruthless in it's scheduling.

Not a bad combo for a week.

Restores one's faith in going out to the cinema.