Showing posts with label impeachment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label impeachment. Show all posts

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Jacked

So with less than a month to go before taking the reins of U.S. foreign policy, President-Elect Barack Obama gets some sudden fences, starting with the Israeli attack on Gaza, in retaliation for the recent resumption by Hamas of missile attacks on southern Israel. The upshot:

Part of what is going on today with Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak's unleashing of massive Israeli airpower against Hamas offices in Gaza is a test of Obama's America. Hamas's decision to end its "lull", or temporary ceasefire with Israel, also has a lot to do with testing the U.S. and seeing what the outlines of Obama's policy will be.

Barack Obama cannot afford to allow his presidency and its foreign policy course to be hijacked by either side in this increasingly blurry dispute. Israel's actions today just created thousands of aggrieved and vengeful relatives committed to delivering some blowback against Israel.

Hamas, at the same time, overplayed its hand at a fragile time. Hamas will never play the role of supplicant or subordinate to Israel's interests -- but its resumption of violence before the Israeli elections and during a time of transition in US politics triggered a devastating response from Israel that significantly undermined its own interests as a potentially responsible steward of a Palestinian state.

The violence we are watching is just yet another installment in the blur of tit-for-tat violence from both sides of this chronic foreign affairs ulcer.

If I were Barack, I'd be reaching for the Pepto-Bismol. Especially when George was fencing me in with this:
Agence France-Presse reports that Georgian officials will sign a "strategic partnership" treaty on Jan. 4 in Washington. On Tuesday, the Department of State issued the first confirmation that the United States and Georgia would pursue a more formal security arrangement.

I suppose it beats a U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran, but the Cheney Administration still has four weeks to make it happen.

Impeachment articles would have slowed this.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Impeachalypse Now?

A "target-rich environment" of crimes. Impossible to walk very far and not "trip over crimes." So says Constitutional Law expert Jonathan Turley of George Washington University regarding the Articles of Impeachment introduced into the House yesterday by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). Destruction of evidence, illegal surveillance, unlawful torture. Turley says:
And what's amazing is that the President is hiding in plain view. He hasn't really denied the elements of these offenses. So all that is lacking is political will.

The long-awaited/GOP-suppressed Phase II of the Senate Intelligence Committee's Report on Prewar Iraq Intelligence came out this week and the only surprising thing is that there is absolutely nothing surprising in it. The gang in the White House these past eight years were exactly as bad as expected all along. And bald-faced about it.

There's co-sponsor support for the 35 articles from Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) as well, and some arguments that it would be good for Republicans to vote for them, although admittedly far-fetched. It's far-fetched to think the articles will even come up for a vote or, if they do, any of them ever pass.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has long kept impeachment off the table, if only as a political tool so as not to let the steam out of the kettle before November 4th when we'll really need to throw them out.

The uses of impeachment include just threat value, per John Nichols a way to stop Presidents before they do something worse. Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) gets it, having threatened impeachment should President CheneyBush attack Iran in any way without direct Congressional authorization.

The core question is whether we believe that we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law or not. There are a zillion reasons why not, but all of them are ultimately strategic. In some sense, the core reasoning deal seems to be, "Don't do anything else big and stupid before January 20th, and we'll let you run out the clock."

On the other hand, the Iraq War, based on their willful lies and manipulation of intelligence for opportunistic purposes, is now in its sixth year.

What about justice for them?

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Solution

Unlike "Clinton Derangement Syndrome" suffered by rightwingers, aversion to, dislike or outright hatred of George W. Bush Jr. is actually rational, because that man actually hates humanity. Why else would he:

- Veto a child health bill.

- Threaten to veto a bill outlawing torture by our American government.

- Be the sole impediment to progress in combating global ecological cataclysm.

How to beat back the bastards Presidents Cheney and Bush?

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) has a simple, effective, logical solution.

By the way, here's where you send the world a message.

Here's our fantasy President, bringing the house down.

Friday, November 09, 2007

Just Do It

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) has very shrewdly introduced a motion to commence impeachment hearings against Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney.

What's smart of this is that if the Democratic leadership grows maybe just one additional testicle and ovary and at least permits it to go forward, it immediately puts pressure on the Vice President's Office to prepare a defense, which historically how impeachment hearings have been used to hamper Presidencies.

What's also smart is that after the Clinton impeachment debacle, and with Bush's much more rigorous plausible denial mechanics and puppet-like reputation, no one series expects he could be impeached, and no one wants to waste the Electorate's goodwill by going there.

On the other hand, everybody but a core uninformed, alcoholic, obstinate and wingnut constituency actually fears and despises Cheney, and there would be no tears in making him go. We Americans want him out, and we feel the world will be much safer without him in power.

There's a pretty brilliant clip here of Kucinich by live feed up against Tucker Carlson on that blowhard's show. Kucinich handles Carlson deftly, with the once bow-tied one slipping misleading throwaways like calling impeachment proceedings "overthrow", and Kucinich catching and correcting him on it.

The ambush-style interview actually turns out to make me think that impeachment hearings against Cheney are possible, that due to a public buzz and call for the hearings, the Democratic leadership might ease its docking of the bill.

Some are optimistic, but I can't get there yet. The establishment Dems against it are looking for a clean path to Tuesday 11/04/08, enough of an agenda passed to run on, constant veto-doomed votes to withdraw from Iraq to make their base think that they're at least trying, more GOP implosion and maybe even a Ron Paul 3rd Party run.

What I do imagine is that if there's any public airing of Cheney's actual deeds and those of his Libby-like subordinates, things could snowball fast. Imagine how excited the Democratic electorate would be, and a lion's share of independents. Maybe even Ron Paul?

How fast could things start happening?

All I know is that in his role as Vice President, Cheney has a pit-bottom 23% approval rating, and a punishing 60% disapproval rating. Those have to be record numbers for an American Vice President.

Just do it.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Amen

Go watch Keith on that lying bastard Bush.

What a heartless, greedy son of a bitch.

No end while he is in office.

Follow the nuns.

Worst President ever? He's in the running for one of history's greatest villains, especially if he lights up Iran.
Show all
Anger is an entirely appropriate response.

To evil.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Power is Taken

There's a crazy load of news today:

- Legendary, historically pivotal Swedish film director Ingmar Bergman (b.1918) dies at age 89.

- The vacation home of Sen. Theodore Fulton "Ted" Stevens (R-AK, b.1923), at age 83 the longest-serving Republican in the Senate, is raided by the FBI looking for corrupt links to the Alaskan oil business.

- Ground-breaking late night talk show host Tom Snyder (b.1936) dies of leukemia at age 71 in San Francisco.

- Brand new Chief Justice John Glover Roberts Jr. (b.1955) has his second publicly known seizure while on at his summer home in Maine.

- The move to impeach Attorney General Albert Gonzales (b. 1955) begins, not appearing to having been initiated by the leadership, but rather Congressman Jay Inslee (D-WA). It is no longer inconceivable that he could be impeached. As of tomorrow, it will be underway.

Is there any hope for the current generation, i.e. those leaders born in the 1950's?

The only Presidential candidate in the Democratic Party that is strictly about speaking truth to power is Senator John Edwards (b. 1953), and there's video of him doing twice, publicly, this past week.

He did it first at the CNN YouTube debate. He said the words regular American need to hear:
If you listen to these questions, they all have exactly the same thing, which is how do we bring about big change? And I think that’s a fundamental threshold question. And the question is: Do you believe that compromise, triangulation will bring about big change? I don’t.

I think the people who are powerful in Washington -- big insurance companies, big drug companies, big oil companies -- they are not going to negotiate. They are not going to give away their power. The only way that they are going to give away their power is if we take it away from them.

He did it again, with some added kick, in a smalltown gathering in New Hampshire:
I believe America needs change in the worst kind of way. And I don't mean little change, I mean big change. And I don't believe that change is going to come from negotiation and compromise. I think there are powerful interests in Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. is broken. It does not work. The entire system is rigged, and it's rigged against you...the insurance companies to drug companies to oil companies, those people run this country now...

I think you've got to take them on and beat them, I don't think you can sit at a table and negotiate with them. The idea that they're going to voluntarily give up their power, that's a fantasy, and that will never happen.

And we will never be able to have universal health care, be able to change the way we use energy and tackle global warming. The big issues that face this country. They are standing in between and the change that we need. It's that simple.

Be still my heart. Truth, so rare, so liberating.

What is there to really disagree with in here? Of course, he's right! Power never yields just because you wish it would, that it would make great sacrifices to take care of you. It only yields when forced to. And the corporate powers he speaks of are some of the richest in the span of human history.

Is it any wonder that the media just wants you to think about haircuts? They may not be scared of Edwards yet, but they're clearly invested in stopping him. And well they should be.

More here.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

Next

The New York Times tells it like it is:

As far as we can tell, there are three possible explanations for Mr. Gonzales’s talk about a dispute over other — unspecified — intelligence activities. One, he lied to Congress. Two, he used a bureaucratic dodge to mislead lawmakers and the public: the spying program was modified after Mr. Ashcroft refused to endorse it, which made it “different” from the one Mr. Bush has acknowledged. The third is that there was more wiretapping than has been disclosed, perhaps even purely domestic wiretapping, and Mr. Gonzales is helping Mr. Bush cover it up.

Democratic lawmakers are asking for a special prosecutor to look into Mr. Gonzales’s words and deeds. Solicitor General Paul Clement has a last chance to show that the Justice Department is still minimally functional by fulfilling that request.

If that does not happen, Congress should impeach Mr. Gonzales.

Bingo.

Whodunnit?

The Cheney/Bush Administration is using their favorite criminality dodge, "executive privilege" (not in the Constitution), to keep us, America, from knowing what they did in the Pat Tillman death incident.

Tillman was a role model, a young, impossibly handsome NFL football player who selflessly put his career on hold to enlist after 9/11. When he was killed in Afghanistan the Iraq War-hungry Administration spun it as a brave death by enemy fire.

Then they stonewalled his family on the truth.

Turns out not only is it obvious at this point that Tillman was killed by friendly fire, but new documents reveal it was at a lot closer range than previously thought:
"The medical evidence did not match up with the scenario as described," a doctor who examined Tillman's body after he was killed on the battlefield in Afghanistan in 2004 told investigators.

The doctors — whose names were blacked out — said the bullet holes were so close together that it appeared the Army Ranger was cut down by an M-16 fired from a mere 10 yards or so away.

The Defense Department launched no criminal investigation. So what else has just come to light:
• In his last words moments before he was killed, Tillman snapped at a panicky comrade under fire to shut up and stop "sniveling."

• Army attorneys sent each other congratulatory e-mails for keeping criminal investigators at bay as the Army conducted an internal friendly-fire investigation that resulted in administrative, or non-criminal, punishments.

• The three-star general who kept the truth about Tillman's death from his family and the public told investigators some 70 times that he had a bad memory and could not recall details of his actions.

• No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene — no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck.

This is obviously bad for democracy, bad for the military and bad for the republic. But what's starting to get creepy is that it turns out Pat was nothing like the GOP-policy supporting stereotype they fabricated. He was against the move into Iraq, even planning to meet with noted anti-war/anti-imperialism thinker Noam Chomsky and evidently supported John Kerry for President.

So now that it appears to have been friendly fire that killed him, the looming question is whether this was an accident, or was Pat Tillman murdered?

And if he was, and the Administration knew, all the way up to President Bush, aren't they all guilty of covering up the crime?

Is that what this "executive privilege" is all about -- finally a very vivid grounds for impeachment of both Mister Bush and President Cheney?

And while some might even wonder if an order to kill Pat Tillman came from the executive branch, it sure cannot be true.

It just can't.

Can it?

Monday, July 23, 2007

Cribnotes

Happy Monday, and to start off the week, here's a memory jogger for all those reasons you want our current Executive Federal leadership impeached.

Amazing how far back some of this footage goes. Hard to believe most of these criminals are still in office.

Tell your Senator and Representative what you'd like them to do about it.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Something to Hide

Today Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) gave former Karl Rove aide Sara Taylor a civics lesson:
"I took an oath the president, and I take that oath very seriously," Sara Taylor said in answer to a question early in the hearing.
And right after a break, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked her if she was sure about that. "Did you mean, perhaps, you took an oath to the Constitution?"

There you have it, the story of the past 7 years in a nutshell. The Constitution, in the GOP Cheney/Bush/Rove crime organization is for bathroom use. All the rest is just expressions of power for the advancement and protection of the privileged few.

In the clip Ms. Taylor looks crazy, like she's either not been sleeping or hitting some sort of pharmaceutical. Clearly as another of the vacuously ambitious Republican hired henchpeople for the Cheney/Bush/Rove crime family, what we're seeing revealed on the outside is her moral interior, a house of cards in free-fall collapse.

All of this comes from the Federal Prosecutor purge that clearly the highest officials directed. Why else would they have so much to hide? Why else would Mister Bush direct former aide Harriet Miers (the once and never Supreme Court nominee) to not honor her subpoena to appear before the committee tomorrow?

I don't care how long Ms. Miers worked for George "Junior Soprano" Bush. She doesn't work for him now -- he has no authority to stop her from appearing!

Better yet, welcome a clear and immediate impeachable offense -- per a TPM reader, Bush just committed a felony:
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 : ... Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes ... the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress ... [s]hall be fined under this title, [or] imprisoned not more than 5 years ... or both.

For the record, I don't care on what charge President Dick "Tony Soprano" Cheney or Mister Bush are impeached.

After all, they only got Al Capone on tax evasion.

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Endgame

Everything is falling into place, in a rather frightening way.

The White House knows, everyone except Bush and probably Cheney and maybe Rove if he's drunk his own Kool-Aid, that the Iraq War has failed. They are failures. And they are just trying to get through their days...good luck with history:
White House officials fear that the last pillars of political support among Senate Republicans for President Bush’s Iraq strategy are collapsing around them, according to several administration officials and outsiders they are consulting. They say that inside the administration, debate is intensifying over whether Mr. Bush should try to prevent more defections by announcing his intention to begin a gradual withdrawal of American troops from the high-casualty neighborhoods of Baghdad and other cities.
The scary part of the NY Times article:
The views of many of the participants in that discussion were unclear, and the officials interviewed could not provide any insight into what Vice President Dick Cheney had been telling President Bush.

All the Republicans in Congress have finally realized that they are screwed as long as Bush holds that office. as long as the War goes on. Andrew Sullivan has a terrific piece in today's Sunday Times, "Emperor Bush Unnerves Republicans". It's worth a read, particularly the second half. Here's the ending:

The only thing Washington loves less than a lame-duck president is a completely unpredictable lame-duck president. They are scared that he could do anything, without real consultation. The Libby decision was made just like the decision to author-ise torture: it was done outside the normal channels of government, blindsiding key aides, and shocking the establishment. If he did this once – and he has done it many times – he could do it again. And so, for all his failure and polling dive, he retains the capacity for surprise. Which is the capacity for relevance.

This is all he’s got left. The mighty power of the presidency, a predilection for sudden action, and absolutely nothing to lose. This lame duck, in other words, could quack or fly without warning. And Washington, for all its increasingly open contempt for him, is rattled by the possibility. They don’t know what’s coming; but they know they’ll have to adjust.

In this, perhaps for the first time, even Republicans are having a familiar experience. They now know what it’s like to be a European with this president. And they are longing for it to be over.


All they ever had was the fear card. And now they're even scaring their own. Nearly 40% of the country favors impeaching Mister Bush. I say impeach Cheney first, guilty with Libby, filthy guilty with everything. But it's still a growing number. He may lie about it, but he's not going to reverse himself. It's all just their corporation. It's in their DNA.

How bad is it in Iraq? After a 250 weekend exploded corpse count, the two main factions of the Iraqi government are BOTH urging their people to arm themselves. That's right: defend your family with firepower. As in: No Rule of Law.

The New York Times said in an extraordinarily long editorial this weekend to be orderly about it but just get out. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) senses it is time to set up a vote on the exit. Meanwhile there's an ex-Karl Rove aide whom the Cheney/Bush Administration is trying to block from testifying in Congress on the politicized Federal Prosecutors crime investigation. There's a potential visit to the Senate Judiciary Committee by successful Libby prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald.

What makes this all so scary is that there are reports that, if true, up the ante with Iran nuclear development stand-off, about tunneling in mountains, most likely to hide or shelter something big, related and dangerous.

At a time when we need true, intelligent, reliable leadership more than ever, all we may get is World War III. I don't believe any of this would be happening had Al Gore been appointed President rather than Mister Bush.

I've noted a number of times that I expect Bush to leave his term, should that come to pass, radioactive. Even if Cheney gets painted as The Influencer, it's The Decider who will seem like a ghoul, a nightmare figure to haunt the dreams of Iraqi children and ours. His henchmen are already unpopular, even if retired.

But if you want to know how unpopular he has become, check out tourism in Crawford, TX, per The Houston Chronicle:
From a wooden bench in front of a shop selling mementos of "The Western White House," tourist Chuck Yorde wondered aloud why he seemed to be the only visitor in town.

"If his poll numbers were up there above 50-60 percent, this place would probably be a little more jumping," said Yorde, surveying the empty parking spots up and down Lone Star Parkway...

...Shuttered storefronts and eroding retail sales figures show tourism and the Bush memorabilia business are slumping in this once-sleepy farm-and-ranch town of 732 residents.

A for-sale sign is the only thing in the smudged window of the turn-of-the-century, two-story brick building that once housed the Crawford Country Style store. "The numbers just weren't working," said Norma Nelson Crow, who closed the shop at the beginning of the year.


Republicanism. Good for the economy.

Friday, June 29, 2007

Loser-in-Chief

Oh, my goodness, Mister Bush has no domestic agenda left. None that comes to mind, none that could possibly be relevant to what is actually needed in America, none that Congress would possibly concern itself with -- none that even a Republican would carry water on.

Why?

Because Bush put it all on the line for the immigration bill and failed. Big time.

As Josh Marshall says accompanying this video from Mister Bush's post-mortem on his last shot:
Have you ever seen such a sad-sack president?

Unless something flips like crazy in the next year and a half, Mister Bush can kiss any legacy (other than murder, torture, and the debilitation of America's image in the world) goodbye. This is beyond lame-duck.

And what does the rest of the Republican Party have to offer? Nothing but obstructionism, of which they are perversely proud. When you read about public disapproval of Congress, did a little deeper to understand that it's the Republicans in Congress whom the public most disapproves of.

The GOP Presidential candidates don't even bother debating issues that actually matter to most Americans, like health care or real energy independence or restoring the U.S. to world greatness. And why would they? Their leading candidates are better known for torturing dogs. With character like that, Mitt Romney shouldn't be running for President, he should be running for Warden of Abu Ghraib!

Maybe Mister Bush's legacy will be a partial border fence that actually requires a stretch rebuild at a cost of million$ due to veering comically into the very country it is trying to block. Maybe it will be a new record in Friday night resignations by guilty-as-sin Justice Department officials, leaving no one but Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to turn out the lights.

In a devastating piece of amateur political agitprop, there's this "Waterloo" video that in provides a chilling compendium of the cast of characters in Mister Bush's awesome loserdom.

Wait, I can think of one last domestic agenda item to set Mister Bush apart in creating his legacy. Bubbling under maybe more powerfully than I have previously imagined...and you can help:

Impeachment.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Impeachable

President Bush refused to give a straight answer to NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell when she asked him if he had engaged in an action which, if he indeed did, would likely constitute and impeachable offense.

We're all used to the Bush deflection and dodge, the turning back of a question with a talking point delivered with macho bravado, a fratish insult to a reporter disguised as a wink. This time seems different -- check it out:
O'Donnell: There's been some very dramatic testimony before the Senate this week from one of your former top justice department officials, who describes a scene that some Senators called stunning about a time when the warrantless wiretap program was being reviewed. Sir, did you send your then chief of staff and White House counsel to the bedside of John Ashcroft, while he was ill to get him to approve os that program and do you believe that kind of conduct from White House officials is appropriate?
Bush: Kelly, there's a lot of speculation about what happened and what didn't happen and I'm not going to talk about it…It's a very sensitive program…
Whatever happened to, "No."?

The short version of the story seems to be that then Attorney General, the arch-Conservative John Ashcroft was actually against the illegal Bush/Cheney spying program, because spying on American citizens -- tapping their phones, reading their mail, reading their emails -- requires a warrant. And one that's not particularly hard or long for the intelligence services to get. But under El Presidente, his henchmen didn't even bother getting those fig leaves.

Ashcroft had just had major surgery when Bush appears to have sent over his personal attorney, current Attorney General (but not for very long anymore) Alberto Gonzales and then Chief-of-Staff Andrew Card, to the hospital get Ashcroft to sign off that the program was somehow legal -- give the blessing of the Department of Justice.

The whole argument was based on some dubious legalese written by authoritarian scholar John Yoo, a man who seems to think the Constitution has granted royal powers to George W. Bush. Even Ashcroft didn't buy it, and despite his wife's protestations to lay off, Gonzales and Card hit the hospital room where the drugged up, recovering Ashcroft still refused to bless this lawbreaking.

I've long said that those who underestimate Bush's awareness, involvement and even direction of his Administration's crimes will later learn how bad things really have been. So when El Presidente ducks a question about his involvement, if he indeed did make the phone call that sent Card and Gonzales to Ashcroft's bedside, even the previously Administration-friendly Washington Post editorial page is flipping out:
Yes, Mr. Bush backed down in the face of the threat of mass resignations, Mr. Ashcroft's included, and he apparently agreed to whatever more limited program the department was willing to approve. In the interim, however, the president authorized the program the Justice lawyers had refused to certify as legally permissible, and it continued for a few weeks more, according to former deputy attorney general James B. Comey's careful testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Under the Constitution, the president has the final authority in the executive branch to say what the law is. But as a matter of presidential practice, this is breathtaking.
The blogosphere is, as usual, more direct. Per Digby:
In any case, Bush was deeply involved. He met with both Comey and Mueller on the issue after they all said they'd resign. The spinners are trying to say that their Dear Leader finally overruled others who had nefarious intentions , but his refusal to answer the question today should put that to rest. There's no reason for him to launch into such outdated 2003 gibberish about enemies lurking who "would like to strike" if he didn't order it. It's obvious that he did.
This has come to a head after former Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey revealed the story in blockbuster Senate testimony yesterday. Everyone is D.C. is still getting a grip on it. The upshot is that since Gonzales is putting his body in the way of El Presidente and probably Karl Rove, the next attempt to shame him into resigning will be a Senate "no confidence" vote.

It's more and more likely to pass as Republicans turn against Gonzales every day. In fact, per the Evans-Novak report, the GOP now wishes that this Administration would just go away.

This was the turning point for disgraced President Richard Nixon, leading to his ignominious resignation. When your own Party finds you such a weighty liability, when you've shredded the Constitution long enough and can't hide behind the scraps of it anymore, you're toast.

Most prophetically of all, the question that may just signal the beginning of the end of Bush and Cheney and Rove's reign of torture, illegal spying on Americans, felonious cronyism and oil-thirsty war, happened during a Rose Garden press conference featuring visiting British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Blair ruined his once brilliant career by backing Bush in invading Iraq, and has now been forced by his own Labour Party and leaden public polls to resign effective June 27th. As Dana Milbank writes, also in the WaPo:
For President Bush, the sensation must have been akin to watching his own funeral.
Listen; can you hear the bell toll?


Crossposted to The Daily Reel.

Monday, April 30, 2007

Happy Anniversary

It was four years ago Tuesday that our El Presidente made a choreographed landing on the U.S.S. Lincoln, took off his flight suit like a regular James Bond and, with a huge banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished" behind him, declared the Iraq War over.

This was the GOP wet dream. Ah, how the media fawned.

Four years later to the day, with the War declared unwinnable by as stalwart a Conservative Republican as William F. Buckley, with the cost rising towards half a trillion dollars before our very eyes, Congress will deliver the stinging War wind-down bill to the White House.

And none too soon.

Just today there is more than a hint by former C.I.A. Analyst Ray McGovern that Vice President Richard Bruce "Dick" Cheney was actually behind the forging of fake evidence that led us to the War. McGovern says he has proof but is waiting to release it -- one can only hope he is not just playing a hunch. He posits a "Watergate plumber" type scenario where Cheney authorized or directed the dirty work, leaving the execution to the type of scum that has been doing GOP dirty work since well before Nixon. Bay of Pigs, anyone?

Imagining that this is the case makes the motivation for Cheney to have personally directed the smear against Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson in which his wife was outed and for lying about which Scooter Libby was convicted. What perfect sense it all makes -- this was Cheney's baby all along.

Defrauding the American people to lead us into a disastrously ill-advised war that benefits only the Halliburton Corporation in which he owns massive amounts of stock, and those of his syndicated buddies...would that not be grounds for impeachment, if not charges of treason?

Maybe McGovern is stretching the proof. Maybe that appearance on Tucker Carlson's show is where it all ends.

Or maybe we'll be hearing more about it.

Happy Anniversary. Dick.