Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Torturous

Of course it's torture, even Ari Fleischer says so now. He's equivocating that it should never be done but sticking his chin out that it works. It's actually humiliating to watch grown men covering their collective asses in such a grudge-holding, adolescent way. Where do you stand, Ari, outside of the politics of it all?

Which is not to say that the Obama Administration is above using politics to combat politics. Cheney opens his mouth, Obama points to prosecutions up the foodchain, leaving the minions alone. Especially as someone leaks potentially damaging info about Rep. Jane Harman, who's on record with a letter to the then Presidente Bush opposing his use of torture in America's name.

This after destroying memos written by longtime diplomat Philip Zelikow opposing the legal reasoning of White House torture-justifiers Jay S. Beybee and John Yoo.

This after using torture to drum up a false link between al Qaida and Saddam Hussein to justify the lie of their invasion of Iraq. To enable more of their snowballing violence.

Yes, waterboarding is torture, as we've defined it in punishing other countries for war crimes, but Cheney and the rest of his morons didn't even know or care:
The top officials he briefed did not learn that waterboarding had been prosecuted by the United States in war-crimes trials after World War II and was a well-documented favorite of despotic governments since the Spanish Inquisition; one waterboard used under Pol Pot was even on display at the genocide museum in Cambodia.

Let us first note that if this is true, the decision to abandon the Geneva Conventions was based on literally criminal ignorance. Anyone with a degree in history or a Google account could have found out any of these things if they had wanted to. I did, as soon as the cascade of evidence of abuse and torture unleashed by Bush came to light. And let us note secondly that this is not a defense. For Tenet to have proposed a criminal torture technique without inquiring as to its history and past use is a function of criminal incompetence. For that, a man who presided over the worst attack on the homeland in US history and compounded it with destroying the moral standing of the US was awarded a Medal of Freedom.

It's a new world now, thanks to the election of Barack Obama as leader of the generations on down and everyone older who's ready to change business as usual around the world. The accoutrements of Western Civilization have spread everywhere and continue to spur liberal thought, as in more personal freedom and interpersonal understanding. What's left are the reactionaries and jihadists on either side, and I just don't think they can grow in any lasting fashion while the rest of the world increasingly pulls together in greater scale than ever in human history.

Take it from the calmest man on Earth:



I mean, what the hell are we doing having the word waterboarding now used so often everyday speech?

Thank the Bush-Cheney Administration. This time there's no one else for them to blame.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

This is actually more disgusting than even I would've imagined: Cheney was torturing guys in order to make them admit to a (non-existent) Iraq/al-Qaeda link, in order to attempt to justify the invasion for the historical record.

For all you 24 lovers, I'll make it clear: This had nothing to do with gathering new, life-saving info. It was a purely self-serving CYA operation.

This is no different, whatsoever, from inquisitioners torturing women in the 16th Century until they admitted to being witches, thereby justifying the necessity of the Inquisition.

You'll also remember that it came out a few years ago that Cheney had people tortured specifically to come up with a either yellowcake or reactor tubes connection so that he could justify his/GWB's dire public lies YEARS AFTER THEY WERE MADE -- ie, again, a case of torturing for political rather than national security reasons.

I haven't been a huge proponent of prosecuting these monsters for a few reasons, the primary one being that there's always the possibility that the admin was in disaster mode, they didn't care what they had to do to prevent another 9/11, and they were acting in good faith. I can understand this, even though I think it's wrong; being responsible for 300 million lives is likely a very lonely place.

As the torture docs are newly pointing out however, Cheney NEVER acts in good faith.

I can guarantee you that he and GWB will never see the inside of a courtroom (cf. Kissinger), but now I'm 100% in favor of going after Yoo and Bybee all the way. They're vermin, and should never ever be in the position of instructing young attorneys or deciding cases from an important bench. Their sycophancy was repugnant, their breach of both their oath of office and their professional oath was disgraceful, and they need to be made an example of so that future holders of their positions think twice before they serve up opinions custom-made to flout the law and preemptively neutralize accountability.

In the words of their former boss, "Bring it on!"