The whole hour:
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
He called for all kinds of responsibility -- for Palestinians to accept Israel, for Israel to stop with the West Bank settlements, for corrupt regional governments to reform, for women to get equal education on the region, for understanding by America of the Muslim world and an end to stereotyping of American by Islamic peoples. Enough truth to offend a lot of partisans.
A sampling of those against it:
Hezbollah, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, John Bolton, Hugh Hewitt, the Republican Jewish Coalition, and John Boehner all disliked the President's speech.Okay, with enemies like that, we know he's doing something right.
As Al Giordano points out, Obama is the Anti-Politician:
Here's ten key points from this, the biggest speech of his already remarkable career. A President who can finally talk to Palestinians. Speaking to the U.S. from Cairo as well. The first President to acknowledge that America, in 1953, sabotaged democracy in Iran when fairly elected Prime Minister Mossadegh had the temerity to nationalize the oil industry), starting the chain of blowback that led to radical Islamic revolution, U.S. hostages, today's nuclear threat.Politicians, in general, are a reactive caste. They look at things as they are, and opportunistically seek out and study the cracks and weaknesses in society in order to put themselves at its helm. Most believe (and those that don’t believe, pretend) they are doing this in service of a higher ideal: right or left, liberal or conservative, progressive or religious, whatever, but because the great majority of them are essentially reacting to the same set of seemingly inexorable current events, the sum of their actions is that of constructing individual fiefdoms that look much the same no matter what ideology or flag flies over them.
And then there are the rare historical figures that appear now and then in human events to disregard those base reactive impulses with enough discipline to first develop their own idea of how things ought to be. And only after developing a detailed yet clear vision for society do they then enter the political fray. Probably the best example in the last century of such an anti-politician was Mohandas K. Gandhi, who returned home to India at the age of 46, after winning civil rights for immigrants in South Africa. He found a homeland thirsting for independence from the British Empire and its impositions. A media hero and cause celébre upon his return to Indian shores, the pro-independence advocates and parties sought Gandhi out to lead a revolution against the Crown.
Gandhi – conscious that after being away for 27 years in London and South Africa he did not know his native country well enough to lead it – instead imposed upon himself a moratorium against speaking to the press, and embarked upon a listening tour through the forgotten and impoverished regions of India in order to first understand what the real yearnings and realities of its people were. Only after he felt he had a comprehensive enough vision for what kind of better society was possible there did he enter the fray that, as history knows, won independence for the region, while showing the world a new way to fight for freedom.
Listening to the President’s remarks in Cairo this morning – billed as a speech to all the Muslims in the world – it is clear that in Barack Obama our moment in history has one such transcendent leader.
Here's how Netanyahu watched the speech, Kabuki reactions. Here's the overwhelmingly favorable reaction from the world press, including the mainstream Islamic press.
Michael Scherer has the clearest sense of Obama's overriding international vision, this "Obama Doctrine", and how it played out with the powerful close of the speech:
This vision, as I have touched on before, does not elevate the United States as the protector of transcendent values, but rather lowers America into the great pool of nations and peoples, where everyone operates on the same level with a God-given set of responsibilities to understand each other and work together for collective improvement. The political leader who has spent a lifetime moving between cultures envisions a world where tribal differences are trumped by common humanity and practical necessity. In some ways, it is as idealistic a vision as the ones proposed by Bush senior and junior. Time will tell if it is more successful.Yes we, the world, can.It is notable that Obama ended his speech with three quotes, one from the Koran, one from the Talmud, one from the New Testament, each describing God's instructions for all people to work together and get along. Of the three, the quote from the Koran is the most eloquent. “O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.” It is, in a poetic verse, an apt encapsulation of Obama's radical idea--that despite our differences we are meant to find common purpose.
So can it be done? Well, Obama is saying to the world, look at me: the son of a Kenyan and a Kansan, the Christian man with a Muslim family, the black Hawaiian teenage stoner who rose through the traditionally white Northeastern Ivy League to lead the nation's most powerful country. I've already done it. You can too.
But will we?
5 comments:
And may the God of all faiths protect Obama.
He's speech was noble. But talk is cheap, how are we going to shift our weight to stop a conflict that's been brewing for... (looking for the right word) ever.
List of Middle East Peace Proposals
Is Obama's speech the catalyst that will bring a reaction of peace, when previous peace proposals failed? Don't get me wrong The President is really a charismatic, if not enchanting speaker, who hypnotizes all of us easily by his carefully crafted speeches. However I reiterate talk is cheap, and without being too pessimistic this conflict is far from over. I fear that it may either take a complete geographical re-transplantation (or God forbid, the complete eradication) of the Palestinians or the Israelis and neither is going to volunteer to be recipients of that action.
Besides wasn't that how (re-transplantation) this all started in the first place?
I actually don't agree that talk is cheap, although cheap talk is. Obama's talk is actually very risky, putting him in the bullseye for a number of enemies, not the least of which are the radical militants who don't want him to succeed. (And I'm not just talking about dittoheads.) The fact that there are such a variety of different reactions to his speech than one by any other President up to now is interesting. The fact that he used both the language of the region as well as acknowledging truths that some at home know to be true but don't want uttered is not cheap.
Talk is, after all, a form of action, and anyone who forgets that lesson from Obama's Presidential campaign has a pretty short memory. Back then Hillary and the GOP called it "pretty words" as if they meant nothing -- which is true for 95-99% of politicians. But when you get someone transformational, the words stir hearts into action, hence a historic victory thanks to people working for him in ways they never had for any candidate before.
Sure, I'll be looking like everyone else to see how he makes things actually change over in the Middle East, if he can get Hamas to accept Israel and Israel to stop growing settlements. But I've been looking forward to the world getting a taste of Obama's strategic and executional capabilities ever since November 4th, and think they've got some surprises coming...the same ones his opponents have tasted over here.
Real leaders lead by educating, and to do that you have to start by being honest, and by acknowledging those things that everyone knows to be true but no one wants to talk about.
In that sense BHO's speech was a stunner. The man's got huge balls -- there was little he said that was unknown but much that you would never hear spoken aloud in public by an American politician. But it's exactly this kind of honest talk that defuses many of the radicals' most potent weapons.
As for ending conflict in the ME, words won't cut it, and I don't expect to see peace in the ME in my lifetime. However, I think BHO's still in the very beginning of the long process of trying to repair America's reputation in the rest of the world.
Our international reputation has always been more valuable to our strategic interests than all the bombs we can manufacture, which is something Dick Cheney and the neocons -- for all their jingoistic blustering about American Exceptionalism -- never did and still don't understand.
I think it's difficult for people who haven't spent a lot of time abroad to really understand the disaster that starting a phony war and waterboarding and Guantanamo and Abu Grhaib were to our relations with all of those nations and people out there in the world who'd like to be our allies.
We'll see what happens, but for the time being it looks like most of the world is satisfied to hear some of the right words and is willing to cut BHO some slack as he tries to move the US from being part of the problem to part of the solution.
As for me, my money's on the homey.
Post a Comment